Thermal Clip

Thermal Clip

Tuesday, June 23, 2015

Jurassic World Review.


For a more detailed review of the movie, that I highly recommend, visit @Stevehouse11's review here.  This post mostly deals with the "theme" of Jurassic Park.  

The original Jurassic Park is damn near perfect.  There is a clear thesis versus anti-thesis (Dinosaur theme park versus playing God), characters that are easy to root for and interesting, tension reminiscent of a horror movie, and a clear goal.  There is also a subplot about the dinosaurs being animals, not monsters, which is reiterated in the final scene of the movie when Dr. Grant watches birds over the ocean.  They are our dinosaurs and it should forever be that way.

Jurassic World however, is a mess.  It still has the "don't play God" theme, but the characters are bleh, the tension is thrown away for ACTION PACKED ACTION DINO-ACTION, and the goal is weirdly confused.

Chris Pratt is fine even though he comes across as Dinosaur Lord.  I complained on Twitter about his ability to control Raptors, but in retrospect, that's okay.  Categorizing Raptors as similar to a pack of wolves was a good choice in my opinion.  I was always skeptical of their super intelligence in previous films.  My only real complaint is that his character lives in a trailer on the island because OF COURSE HE DOES.  Can we please kill of this cliche?  Dude makes a hefty salary working at this park.  Like, what?  Is he saving money for some character development thing that was edited out of the movie?

He has the same facial expression in every screenshot.

Bryce Dallas Howard's (I had to look up her name) character Claire was weird.  She kind of came across as a villain in the beginning of the movie only to later become "Token Hero #2" without any real change.  Her villain feel comes from her wanting to save the park and containing the situation instead of the more obvious EVACUATION plan any sane person would have called for.  I know it's a PG-13 movie so all this stuff happened off screen but, a ton of people died on her watch. She's a hero?

Also, there was a couple kids in this movie but who cares?  I remember nothing about them except for some bizarre parents getting divorced subplot that the movie just drops halfway through.  Is that all the character development we get for these two?  Seriously?  Oh wait....no, we also learn that younger brother likes dinosaurs because obviously, and we learn older teenage brother likes girls because OBVIOUSLY.  It's like these kids came out of the book "Complete Hacks Guide to Writing Child Characters."  I don't even remember their names.

"Shire LaBeef and MopTop"

Jurassic World also seems to have completely changed the tone of the previous movies.  The original movie had fantastic tension and suspense.  In JW, I never really felt like the characters lives were at risk.  (This is a common problem in modern day, AAA movies by the way).  I was more worried about the Raptors getting owned by the Indominous Rex - GODDAMN do I hate that name.  He sounds like a fucking Pope.



Also, what is the goal for our heroes here?  Is it to save the park or save the tourists?  It's more vague than I would like.  So much of the movie seems to be less about survival and more about saving InGen's stock.  It's like this movie was written by business executives or something...executives that apparently don't know anything about business.

BY FAR, my biggest complaint about this movie, isn't really about the movie itself.  It's the concept. Why does Jurassic World EXIST?

Are you going to tell me, that InGen can open another dinosaur park, on the same island as the original Jurassic Park, where five people died, and this is just okay?  Don't get me wrong, I think people would still visit it, but from a business perspective, how?  Wouldn't InGen be swamped with lawsuits from the families of the deceased as well as congressional hearings about the legality of the whole enterprise?  Why would they sink their money into this a 2nd time?  What, exactly, does InGen make money on OUTSIDE of dinosaur theme parks?

Obviously evil.

Also, if the first movie is canon, what about the other two?  You know, including one where a T-Rex CASUALLY RAMPAGES THROUGH FUCKING SAN DIEGO?  Did they cover this up or something?  InGen has more money than the Umbrella Corporation.

Not obviously evil?

Sorry but this isn't a nitpick.  This is never explained.  If this was a hard reboot, where the other movies don't exist, then this entire complaint would be moot.  Granted I liked all the callbacks to the original movie, but it opened a fuck ton of plot holes.  And why the hell do we STILL know nothing about that shadow corporation that hired Newman from Seinfeld to steal Dino DNA in the first movie?  Obvious story potential never explored.  They are the reason the events of Jurassic Park happened!!!  What....the....hell?

Okay.  I feel you getting angry with me.

To be fair, as much as I hate this movie, I don't, like, "hate" hate it.  It's still better than Jurassic Park 3.  The movie also deserves a lot of props for explaining why the dinosaurs don't quite look right due to gene splicing and shit (recent scientific evidence suggests most dinosaurs had feathers...like BIRDS you evolution denying fucks).  And the movie's action scenes, at the expense of any real tension, where pretty....

NOPE.  Sorry.

The CGI is wretched.  Like....did most of the people who liked the special effects never see a Final Fantasy cutscene before?  What about Metal Gear Solid?  The Raptors look about 3 feet shorter than they ever did, have fluorescent skin tone apparently, and act like pitbulls.  The giant alligator dinosaur looked like something from a SyFy movie.  Even the Indominous Rex (GODDAMN DO I HATE THAT NAME) had weird cartoon hands that look slightly better than Reboot.

Mmmmmm...maybe not.

Yes, the original Jurassic Park popularized CGI (along with Independence Day) but used it sparingly.  Only two scenes used CGI exclusively, everything else was good ole practical effects.  If there is one blight in AAA Hollywood movies that I could correct, it's this.  Stop being fooled.  Compare this movie's CGI to Sharknado and see what that massive budget did.

I'm not going to lie, I wish this movie was something else.  I wish it was a hard reboot.  I wish character development meant something (it doesn't take long, Mad Max:Fury Road did it in like 5 minutes).  I wish the tone wasn't changed since it was a key part of the franchise.  And I wish Hollywood would stop making movies that are all about the CGI and not about anything that actually matters.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Follow me on Twitter since most of you hate me now.

Thursday, June 18, 2015

Game of Thrones Season 5. Hope Versus Despair

Spoiler Warning:  If you are not caught up to the end of Season 5 of Game of Thrones, STOP reading.  Spoilers everywhere, espcially with the finale.

Side Note:  I have not read the books.  This post is strictly dealing with the TV show.  



Game of Thrones has always been appealing due to its ability to successfully walk a line between hope and despair.  The world of Westeros, and Essos, is a brutal one where the powerful rule with brute force, political games, and knowing just who to be friends or enemies with.  Even then, the powerful don't always rule for long ever since the cascade of drama that the execution of Ned Stark started.  However, the series has always been able to provide just enough hope that things can and could be better even with the impending doom of the White Walkers.

Season 5, however, was a season where despair, pain, suffering, and hopelessness routinely won out.  There are only brief moments of hope, and even then, they are severely compromised.

To show you what I mean, lets go on a tour of each locations story arc.  Click the article title to read the full post.


Friday, June 12, 2015

My Love/Hate Relationship With Final Fantasy X (HD Remaster "Review")



For pretty much every game I've played, I could give a single one word opinion on.  "Great!" "Good." "Okay." "Balls."  Mass Effect 2 is "scrumtrulescent".  Thief is "shitty".  Skyrim is "boring".  The Area 51 arcade game is...what's the one word equivalent to "Why is the gun so sticky"?  Is it just "sticky"?

Final Fantasy X, however, DEFIES opinion.  My one word opinion of this game is "....uh....wa...be...gah".  I CAN'T.  It is my one true love and my worst enemy.  I can't even say it's "okay" because it's worse than okay, in fact, it's so much BETTER than okay that GAHHHHHHHH.

But I am determined to finally put this piece of shit game behind me and cherish it for all time.  I, for some reason, decided to torture myself by spending what was left on an Amazon gift card after buying a case of Surge, on the Final Fantasy X/X-2 HD Remaster when I noticed it in the recommended items list at the bottom of the page.  (Yes, I might be the only recorded case in history where the Amazon recommended items list actually resulted in a sale).   And "why is this torture?" you might ask.  Because...this is the 4th time I've played this game, yet I still cannot really tell you how much I liked this game.  

So you know what?  I'm going to give one word opinions on completely arbitrary aspects of the game and see if I can't find some sort of closure to my favorite game that I hate so much.

Great - The Visuals and The Music

Even before the HD polish, the cutscenes and the music are pretty much a given on how great they 
are.  As bad as Final Fantasy might get, although I don't know how much worse it can get than FF13, or Lightning Returns for that matter, the series always knocks it out of the park on these details.  The cutscenes are gorgeous, especially the iconic sending scene.  The music runs the gamut from prideful orchestral themes, too epic battle themes, sad reflective themes, soul-searching themes (maybe my fav). and too the worst final boss theme ever.  Seriously, that song sucks.  It sounds like a high school garage band trying to play Pantera only the lead singer is a badger.  

Ugh...and this is a "great" category.  This is going to be hard.

I should mention here, that the HD remaster made a great category greater.  The visuals, of course, look even better although I'm not sure if the in game backgrounds were changed all that much.  They look brighter and more colorful, but that's about it.  The cutscenes are where the visual improvements are most noticed as characters look more real than ever.  The audio is really improved too, almost to the point where I thought some of the dialog had been re-dubbed.  The, mostly, great music sounds much fuller and is higher fidelity.  Even the final boss theme sounds better, even if it still sucks.

To be fair, the dude looks like metal Santa Claus.

Fantastic - The Combat System

This combat system is so good, I went on a mission to find a game that uses something similar.  That is how I found my beloved Persona series.  It's THAT good.

Unlike previous Final Fantasy games, FFX ditched the Active Time Battle thing for a traditional turn based system.  (Yes, I'm saying this games combat system was better than my 3rd favorite game of all time's combat system).  You can switch party members in and out of combat, something no other Final Fantasy at the time would allow you to do, so you can deal with various enemies strengths and weaknesses.  Some enemies can only be defeated with speed.  Some are armored and need a heavy hitting character.  Some fly and can only be hit with ranged attacks and magic.  Some...for lack of a better term, are blobs of goo that have a high defense to everything except a certain magic element.

While random battles do get repetitive after a while, the bosses really up the ante and can be quite difficult, especially after the difficulty spike that is Evrae, the guardian of Bevelle.  Many of the later bosses demand an understanding of buffs and de-buffs as they can be exploited to take advantage of their weakness or to strip them of their strength.  A late boss, Lunalesca, is tough as nails if you don't know what to expect.  She basically forces you to fight her on her terms.  Cure the status effects she inflicts, and she just kills you outright.  It's a great part of this game, fighting a tough boss with very little health due to the Zombie effect, and overcoming it with cunning and adaptability.

I know that looks like a Gorgon head, but when you fight her, that's technically her butt.

I cannot express how good this combat system is.  It's one of the most strategic I have EVER seen.  It's remarkably fast for a turn based system.  Obviously, you can slow things down when needed, but if you get angry and start mashing attack buttons, the characters will do it.  You also have conversational options for some boss fights that act as buffs and de-buffs.  You also have an Overdrive system, that acts like the Limit Break systems of previous Final Fantasy games, that can do massive damage but needs to be managed as some, NOT ALL, get stronger the more they are used.

It should be noted here that as long as a character made an action, you can level up all 7 of them easily.  You can swap a character in on the fly (still can't express how cool this feature is) and you can do any action that doesn't end the battle, and they will get XP. Leveling up is so easy in this game, which is done in something called The Sphere Grid.

Pointless - The Sphere Grid

The Sphere Grid is a...thing?  Place?  Narratively speaking, I don't know what the Sphere Grid physically is, but it's where you spend XP to level up your characters.  You can increase individual stats, learn new abilities, and so on.  Basic RPG skill tree stuff.  The only problem is that it's absolutely pointless busy work as all attributes are learned in almost a straight line.  There is no choice.  Sure, it LOOKS complex, but the path rarely branches off, and when it does, it does so only for about 3 or 4 attribute points.

It's a curvy straight line...if that makes sense.

With the HD Re-Master, I played with the Expert Grid (previously only available to the international version of FFX) which tries to alleviate this problem, but it still fails.  The paths actually let you branch off onto different paths but they are so rare it would be detrimental to do so.  Why would I have my white mage suddenly go down the black mage path halfway through the game?  That would lead me to having some sort of half-assed white mage/black mage character that isn't great at being either.

The whole thing is pointless.  If what I spend XP points on is decided for me, just fucking do it.  Don't make me have to spend 10 minutes activating magic nodes in....space?  My soul?  What the fuck IS The Sphere Grid?

Before I move on to more meatier subjects, I absolutely need to cover a couple of optional side quests.

Broken - Blitzball

Blitzball is a fake sport that seems like a soccer/volleyball/rugby hybrid only under water.  Yep, I know, that already sounds dumb as hell.  The opening cutscenes however makes it look cool as shit, so I was surprised and excited that this was part of the game.  It's mostly just a side quest, but the first game is mandatory so you need to play at least a little of it.

Too bad it sucks.  The cutscene shows a third dimension to soccer and the gameplay strips that from you and forces you onto a 2-D plane.  All player interactions are done stat based, and turn based, because when I like turn based games I was OBVIOUSLY talking about sports games.

Works for RPG's, not sports.

Of course I played the hell out of it during my 1st playthough to get, what turned out to be mediocre items and gear, because the game is very easy to exploit.  The team you are given, The Besaid Aurochs, suck ass mainly because they can't play defense and the goalie has a goddamn 3 catch rating.  3?!?! Even opposing teams worst shooters have a shot rating of 5!!!  So what you have to do, is sucker the other team toward a defenseman, make a long pass to Tidus (protagonist and only good Blitzball player), rush the other teams net and hope to get a one on one with the goalie.  Take the shot, score, then....do nothing.  If you have the lead, just hang back near your own goal and the opposing teams AI just gives up and spins in circles.  Don't swim anywhere.  Just hang tight and run the clock out.

I can't think of any sports game where the opposing teams AI doesn't even attempt to pursue the ball carrier if they do nothing.  I know this isn't a sports game but this mini game was so bad it really hurt the mystique of the overall game.

Also, why the hell can Blitzball players hold their breath for absurd amounts of time?  This is never explained.  I'd accept magic, I would, if somebody just said it's cause magic.  Instead, Blitzball players just...do.  It's weird.

Uuuuuuuugh - The Monster Arena

In the last third of the game, in an area called the Calm Lands, you can unlock the Monster Arena side quest in which you buy special weapons to capture monsters in the game and supply the Monster Arena with monsters and WHY YES, this is stupid too.  Unfortunately, it is mandatory to complete if you want to fight the two hardest bosses in the game and boss battles are one of the best parts of this game.

In order to unlock Nemesis, you need to collect 10 of EVERY MONSTER IN THE GAME, defeat every normal monster in the arena, and defeat every created monster in the arena, all of which takes about 26,798 hours (approx).  Nevermind Penance, who is the hardest boss in the game and requires also defeating every dark Aeon, each of which is incredibly tedious to even unlock.

What is it with Final Fantasy games making you do repetitive bullshit in order to take on it's biggest challenges?  I could study to become an actual rocket scientist in the time it takes to do these.  Even my favorite, Final Fantasy 9, made you do this stupid Chocobo Hot and Cold mini game that seems to go nowhere for an absurd amount of time.  STAHP.

Good - The Plot

This entire game revolves around a flying Godzilla named Sin. It looks sorta like a demonic whale and destroys civilization with god like powers.  Starting the game, you know Sin can be defeated, and HAS been defeated many times in the past, but it always mysteriously comes back.  The world known as Spira, has adopted the religion of Yevon to combat Sin.  Yevon gives Summoners the power to defeat Sin with Aeons, this Final Fantasy's version of summoning, and with the Final Aeon, a summoner can kill Sin, albeit, temporarily.  A summoner is protected by guardians whose sole purpose is to get the summoner to the Final Aeon.  The summoner, and the guardians, make up the "party" of this Final Fantasy.

As the plot progresses, you learn more and more about what a summoner must do to defeat Sin, as you play as the "every man" who knows nothing about this world.

Interesting - The Setting

The world of Spira is pretty facinating for a fantasy setting.  It's not a medieval fantasy as various forms of technology obviously exist even if they are hard to define. There are guns, various machines, and even a salvaged airship. Ruins are all over the place from previous civilizations that have now died out due to Sin.  Just by looking at the design, plus the lore, shows previous civilizations being more advanced in technology.  The Church of Yevon restricts much technological advancement though, for reasons I'll get too.

Terrible - Tidus, The Protagonist

Tidus might be my least favorite character in any Final Fantasy game and that is saying something since Final Fantasy 8 had a womanizing cowboy who withholds crucial information through 2/3rds of the game for absolutely no fucking reason.  Tidus acts as the main character, narrator, and every man of the game.  The narration is fine, and oddly the characters best voice acting, and the every man status was necessary to have other characters explain things to him so the player can understand the world, its customs, lore, etc.

Tidus the protagonist is a ridiculously designed Blitzball player. Actually, he's the star player of the Zanarkand Abes!!!!....a fact he will make sure YOU FUCKING KNOW after repeating it 17 times in the first half of the game.  Zanarkand is a city destroyed a 1,000 years ago by Sin, so naturally, every other character in the game rightfully thinks Tidus is a goddamn lunatic every time he brings it up considering that would make him 1,000+ years old.  It's also funny because another character in the game, Rikku, tells Tidus NOT to tell people he's from Zanarkand, yet he just keeps fucking doing it! Wait, did I say "funny"?  I meant "ludicrously stupid". And in case you're wondering, no, I don't know what a Zanarkand "Abe" is and I'm pretty sure the developers don't either.


DORK

Also, I don't understand WHY he is the main character. Sure, his dad is now Sin (I'll get to that later), but other than that, he has no reason to be here.  In fact, his existence makes the story MORE confusing as revealed near the end of the game.  He's actually a dream made manifest from the souls of the dead or whatever, it's fucking stupid.  The game could have easily made him a side character whose arc could still include his dad becoming Sin, add some scenes about how his romance with Yuna is troubled due to her basically needing to kill her boyfriends dad, and give him a benign origin instead of the sorta real but not really dream person metaphysical crap.

Or better yet, cut him from the game entirely.  This is the first Final Fantasy game to have voice-over dialogue and MAN, does it show.  I'm not sure if it was the voice actor or the writing, probably BOTH, but Tidus is extremely annoying.  Even people who have never played this game probably know of the infamous laughing scene.  Like...did nobody at Square Enix raise their concern that not only was this scene stupid and unnecessary, it's actively annoying?  Tidus spends a lot of the end game whining about how this is "my story" as if the writers are desperately trying to tell us the protagonist isn't....

Okay - Yuna, The Summoner

Except for a prologue, the entire story is about Yuna and her guardians journey to obtain the Final Aeon in order to defeat Sin. And while a lot of other stuff happens in the middle, which I'll get too, she is a de-facto main character.  She is a kind, demure, healer who is confident in her goals but conflicted about her abilities to be the hero Spira needs.  As a character, she has a decent amount of depth, but her character arc is shaky with some shoddy writing.

She's kind of an idiot because one part of her story has her faking marriage to the main villain without letting any one else know her stupid, stupid plan. She only really agrees to do so after he's found out to BE a bad guy so she can send him to the Farplane (this games analog to an afterlife kind of).  But yeah, her guardians are not told so they, you, have no idea why the hell she is doing this and has no back up when shit inevitably hits the fan.

There is also a shoehorned in romance between her and Tidus that was never very convincing.  Yuna gets sad and starts crying under some emotional weight of what her fate is, Tidus decides this is the best time for a first kiss, then...love?  Uh, yeah.  Not to mention, after this underwater make out session, possible sex metaphor scene, her guardians are either totally indifferent or oblivious to the relationship until the very end.

Mixed - The Guardians, or, The Rest of The Main Party

I know a lot of people hated Wakka but I thought he was needed.  Yeah, his hair is stupid, but I thought the game needed a best friend to Tidus who also seemed to be the last person to accept the token Final Fantasy mid game plot twist...wait.  What the hell kind of archetype is that?

Derp

Meanwhile, Lulu is fine despite wearing a heavy winter coat while living on a tropical island and really loves showing off her cleavage.  Also, her skirt/dress is made up of belts, which is awesome and very impractical.  She is a typical JRPG character who is always serious about everything although most of her dialog is explaining things to Tidus.

Kimarhi is a man-sized, bipedal blue lion who doesn't talk much but has one of the better individual character arcs.  He is also the only character who doesn't have a designated Sphere Grid path, letting the player decided what kind of specialty to assign him.  Of course, I send him down Aurons path.

Auron is by far the best character in this game.  He's older, has obviously seen SOME SHIT but you never really learn about any of it until late in the game, seems to be the only one who knows what's really going on, and he hits the hardest and has the highest health.  It's hard to explain, but the dude is pure badass and is a huge juxtaposition to just how shitty Tidus is.

Finally, there is Rikku, who is okay as a character but her inclusion is....ewww. She is here for nothing but underage fan service.  She is supposed to be 15 years old yet she is sexualized all the time in this game.  It's even worse in Final Fantasy X-2 (WAY worse).  However, she is Yuna's cousin and provides conflict to the entire summoning traditions, as well as a lead-in character about the shittiness of the church of Yevon because she is part of an excommunicated minority.

Laughable - Seymour, The Main Villain

I mean come on.  Look at the guy.


What is with the ridiculous hair in this game?\

You see Japan?  This is what happens when you let anime design go too far.  This is, with out a doubt, the worst character design I have ever seen.  How am I supposed to take that seriously?  Dude looks like the owner of a bathhouse for clowns.  In reality, he's a high ranking member of the Church of Yevon, which must not have a dress code.

It doesn't help that the guy talks like a bond villain.  Also, villain motive is illogical and eerily similar to another video game villain (see Mass Effect).  He thinks that Spira is full of pain and sorrow due to Sin, so his plan is to BECOME Sin so he can end pain and sorrow by...killing everybody.  Ummm, no.  Just, just stop.

Hate - The Cloister of Trials

Most of the traveling done in this game leads to one of several Temples of Yevon where you collect Aeons.  In order to do so you must enter the Cloister of Trials to prove your worth to the Fayth to collect said Aeon.  These trails are absolute garbage.  They involve doing some easily solved but tedious puzzles.  The puzzles are about putting glowing balls into certain slots to let you progress further into the temple and eventually reach the Fayth that give Yuna the Aeon.  (More on the Fayth later).

If that sounds like not much of an explanation it's because it's totally true.  These puzzles are completely trial and error.  Try this ball with this slot = nothing happens.  Try this ball with another slot = something glows.  Try a different ball with the first slot = a wall opens. WHY AM I DOING THIS?  It is extremely not fun and even if you know exactly what to do, I shit you not, some trials still take 15 minutes or more.

The last one forgoes balls for Tetris blocks.

More than just the gameplay of it, how does "putting balls in holes" prove your worth to the Fayth anyway?  That's like giving the world's best golfer god like powers.  

Again, they are not hard, but with literally nothing to go on, it's a giant pain in the ass.  There are no hints or clues.  You just try stuff with stuff and often when stuff works with stuff it makes no goddamn sense anyway and you just want to destroy the game disk and set fire to it's remains.  Fuck these trials.  By far, worst part of the gameplay.

Things - The Story

This part is tough and a reason why I've spent a week writing this thing.  The story, on its surface, is decent.  Pretty good even.  The problem though is once you start asking questions, you can REALLY get sucked down a nitpicking waterfall that makes this look like the worst story ever told.

For example, there is one part in the middle where the party gets teleported to the other side of the world because they got to close to Sin's toxin (it can do that I guess).  Once on this desert island, the native inhabitants known as the Al Bhed, the excommunicated people Rikku belong too, somehow learn Yuna is there and kidnap her.  The rest of the party makes it's way to the city only to find Seymour's people have somehow learned of Yuna's location, in a totally unexpected place, and mobilized an army to kidnap her from her kidnappers.  Then, the party boards an airship to crash a wedding in the city of Bevelle, back on the other side of the world, that must have been thrown together in record time considering the party is on the only known airship in existence.  All this takes place, depending on how long you wandered the desert, in about 2 hours of real time.  What is the in world time-frame of these events?  It seems like only a couple of days at most.

Possibly 40 years though.  RELIGION JOKE

See what I mean?  It's not something that major, but there is a ton of these little intricacies that make no sense.  And even with the part in the previous paragraph, I can't complain too much because the wedding crashing scene is one of the coolest scenes in the game.  In fact, Awesome - The Wedding Crashing Scene.    Watch the start of this video, it's fucking rad.

Meanwhile, the Church of Yevon stuff is actually really good.  It turns out, not surprisingly because Final Fantasy games do this all the time, that the Church of Yevon is corrupt.  You learn the church took up worshipping a false god, took control over the only known means to defeat Sin, and covered up the truth so they could maintain power.  The truth being that the false god, Yevon, and Sin is the same thing.

Still though, the Church of Yevon has a really dumb way of executing people.  After Seymour fails to marry Yuna, a stupid plan to begin with, the church puts the group on trial for heresy.  The church then sentences the group to death by...throwing them into a monster filled dungeon with all their equipment and weapons which you can just walk out of.  Why?  Why have an exit or at least one that can be opened from the inside?  Or, why even have the dungeon?  Just hang them or something........

.....sorry.  Sorry.  I'm nitpicking.

Still though, the story isn't all that bad.  Somehow, all these individual crappy parts make up a solid main story despite all reason and logic.  It's an anomaly to every piece of fiction I've ever liked, I swear.  And the funny part is, it gets worse near the end.

Dafuq? - The Climax

Over the course of the game, you learn more and more about Jecht, Tidus's dad.  You learn that he, and Auron, were guardians to Yuna's summoner father, Braska.  He successfully killed Sin 10 years prior to the events of the game.  Jecht proceeds to go missing, while Auron heads to "Zanarkand" to look over Tidus.  You also eventually learn that a summoner must sacrifice him/herself to defeat Sin as simply summoning the Final Aeon will kill the summoner.

Tidus eventually learns that the Zanarkand he is from isn't real, and therefore, he isn't real.  He comes from Dream Zanarkand, a place constructed by the dreams of the Fayth.  The Fayth are the former inhabitants of the real Zanarkand who sacrificed themselves in a massive summoning to create Dream Zanarkand and give the power of Aeons to summoners.  One master summoner, Yu Yevon, draws from their power to create Sin.

The Fayth.  Yeah, yeah I don't know either.

Once you reach Yunalesca in the Zanarkand Ruins, she tells you that she will turn one of the guardians into the Final Aeon and that the final Aeon will become the next Sin.  She tells Yuna, that it must be someone with whom the summoner has a bond with, explaining why Seymour wanted to marry her in the first place (so he could become the next Sin).  This also explains how Jecht becomes Sin.  Yuna, of course, rejects all of this, Yunalesca flips her shit, and you kill her.

Finally, you go back to Bevelle to confront the last remaining church leader to spill the beans on how to end the cycle of Sin's rebirth.  While he doesn't really have an answer, the Fayth in the Bevelle temple beckons you and he explains what Sin actually is.  Yu Yevon inhabits Sin, and when Sin is destroyed, he simply inhabits the body of the Final Aeon that killed it, which he can do cause he's a magic tick now.  Therefore, the only way to truly kill Sin is to kill Yu Yevon, because this wouldn't be a Final Fantasy game if you didn't pick a fist fight with God.

God is more....bug like than expected.

Are you confused?  Me too and I've played this game 4 times.

All of this end game stuff is needlessly metaphysical.  I'm okay with a lot of this being explained away by magic or whatever, but this went wayyyyy overboard.  There are so many holes, SO MANY HOLES!

Jecht disappeared from Dream Zanarkand went he went out to sea for training and ran into Sin, but what the hell was Sin doing there?  Just hanging out in Dream Zanarkand?  When Jecht becomes Sin, it makes sense to go to Dream Zanarkand so he can get Tidus, so that Tidus would kill him and "set him free" and whatnot.  There was no reason for Sin to be there when Jecht got teleported to Spira.

Why are some of the Fayth on top of a mountain summoning Dream Zanarkand and giving Yu Yevon the power to create Sin, while some Fayth are scattered around the globe in temples?

What about the war between Bevelle and Zanarkand that started this mess to begin with?  Was Zanarkand really in that much of a danger of being wiped off the map?  Bevelle was going to kill everyone and the last resort of Yu Yevon was really just summoning Godzilla and destroying everything in return?  That's insane.  WHY DID HE DESTROY HIS OWN CITY and not, say, Bevelle?  I guess you could say "so that Bevelle would start a church to worship him, otherwise end up like Zanarkand", but HOW DID HE KNOW THEY WOULD DO THAT?

And this is jumping ahead, but history gets even more funky when Final Fantasy X-2 is entered into the equation.  We learn that Bevelle had a doomsday weapon called Vegnagun that could easily have won the war outright but they refused to use it do to the whole killing everybody thing.  Bevelle was never going to outright destroy Zanarkand.  Also, why didn't Bevelle at least ATTEMPT to use Vegnagun on Sin instead of starting a damn church?

I don't hate the climax of this game.  The ending is okay (you defeat Yu Yevon, Dream Zanarkand disappears as well as Tidus, and Yuna gives a speech that tried to be poetic about all we lost but the future is bright blah blah blah) and features some good drama.  It is entertaining despite all it's "what the fuckness".  I just think the game would have been better served with a cleaner script and a simpler payoff.  Less magic, more logic.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well.....this got me nowhere.  I guess after writing this super long thing nobody will read, is that my one word review of Final Fantasy X is ".....uh......".  I got nothing.  Lemme think, uh....

Uh.

Hey, that isn't so bad.  FFX is "uh".  Yeah.  YEAH!  This game is complete "uh".  As in, don't ask me about this game because I'll just say, "Uh..." then go on a 10,000 word magnum opus.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Follow me on Twitter where I spent a lot less time talking about Final Fantasy.

I have a much shorter review of my 3rd favorite video game of all time, Final Fantasy 9, here.


Tuesday, June 2, 2015

5 Reasons Why Mad Max:Fury Road is Better Than Most Action Movies.

Needs more Furiosa.

Now that I've seen Mad Max:Fury Road for a second time, I think I can properly write about it in a way I want too.  Forgoing a normal movie review that would read like literally any other review of Mad Max:Fury Road, "It was awesome!  I'm going to Valhalla all shiny and chrome!  Fucking GUITAR GUY!!!!!" I have instead decided to dive deeper into why I personally like this movie and why some of those reasons may contradict how I judge other movies.  As much as I make fun of the practice, I have a tendency of nitpicking movies as well, even though I am trying to change this.

Oh, don't get me wrong, I can still nitpick Fury Road.  For example, how did they test Max's blood type when using him as a blood bag?  Why is Furiosa's missing arm never explained?  For a sequel/reboot, how come Max's back story is only vaguely shown in flashbacks?  What the hell was that briefly shown, four legged stilt, swamp people or....okay, I think it's the rumored "greenland" that went to shit but it's awfully vague.    

None of it matters though because none of it detracted from my enjoyment of the film.  But, why though?

1.  It's a Self Contained Movie.

Unlike Avengers:Age of Ultron (it's the only other movie on this blog we have talked about in depth so I'll be referencing it a little, apologies), Fury Road does not need an extensive knowledge of a cinematic universe to understand.  It's basically mandatory to have seen every solo superhero film to understand what the hell is going on in Avengers:AoU.  Hell, you even need the TV show, Agents of Shield, to understand everything completely.  For Fury Road, having seen the previous Mad Max films is meaningless and arguably detrimental as the continuity is kinda screwy.  

This happened.

The movie is a 2 hour long car chase scene where characters sometimes talk to each other.  The best comparison I've seen is to the movie Dredd, a movie that is super awesome that almost nobody has seen.  (Seriously, it's a sci-fi version of Die Hard.  I'm not kidding).  Dredd is also a very self contained movie.  Everything that happens in both movies, ONLY happens to the characters in the movies.  There are no innocent bystanders (or, they are minimal).  There are no destroyed cities that should have massive effects on the populace.  There is no worldwide changes if the villain wins....speaking of which.

2. The Stakes are Lower

Most action movies now, which are almost all superhero movies, have a plot that revolves around a villain either taking over the world or destroying it.  That isn't necessarily a bad thing. For example, one of the best action movies ever, Terminator 2, is about world fuckery but at least that movie has some nuance about the details, mainly time travel and shit.  But many, many other great action movies don't involve world domination.  Die Hard.  Aliens.  Hot Fuzz (lol).  Yet modern day action movies think "over the top" means ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING is at stake, when a good action movie doesn't need this.*    World domination is a hard thing to conceptualize.  It seems impossible and therefore movies that focus on it are more open to scrutiny.  

*You know what is a high grossing action movie franchise that doesn't do this?  The Fast and the Furious franchise....I'm not sure if I like my own argument now.

Out of Context:  Superhero Movie or Not?  Hard to tell.

If Imperator Furiosa and Max fail, what does that mean for the world of Mad Max?  Nothing, really. The ladies go back into being sex slaves, if not outright killed.  Max is most certainly drained of his precious blood.  Nux is probably tortured to death as an example for the others.  But these lower stakes are closer to real life, which means these characters...

3. The Characters are Very Easy to Root For

This should go without saying but, it's hard to root for a good guy when the good guy is a God that casually destroys a city block with his fight against another Superman, er, I mean God.  It's easy to perceive superheroes as not giving too shits about us because....they largely don't.  Avengers:AoU went out of it's way to show the good guys saving civilians (in response to a major criticism of the first movie I bet), despite the fact that there HAD to be some collateral damage in that final fight with Ultron.  

Also, see any Michael Bay movie ever.  Even the best Transformers movie, the first one, still has a climax that takes place in a major city with destruction everywhere.  Civilians died.  Suspension of disbelief only goes so far.

And nobody died.......

Fury Road, however, has characters that are so easy to root for because everything is so black and white.  Immortan Joe is a warlord who is the gatekeeper to the most precious resource of the Mad Max world, water.  To strengthen his power, he has raised a cult of War Boys addicted to paint huffing (I think???), and has regulated population control with his, uh, "milk women" (I seriously cannot find their names but the old ladies who did their own stunts, the Vuvalani, I CAN find and are badass).  Oh and Immortan Joe takes some of that population as his harem of brides or whatever depraved sex slave metaphor you'd like me to use.  

Not that every movie needs to be black and white since so much of life is a sexy shade of grey (pun intended), but sometimes movies need to make it obvious who the good guys are, which means...

4.  Simplicity is Sometimes Better

Hey, I can get down with a David Lynch movie just like any other art house critic, but action movies are great on a more primal level.  In Fury Road, director George Miller had the novel idea that movies are a visual medium and stuck to the saying, "show, don't tell."  Most of the movie's details are shown rather than given expository dialogue.  How do they get gasoline?  They raid a nearby town that is basically an oil refinery, with an oil pump shown in the foreground.  (They don't actually raid the town in the movie as it's used as a jumping off point).  The aforementioned Max blood bag usage explains why they kept him alive and why later in the movie, he can revive Furiosa.  Even Nux is shown the brutality of his former master when Max shows him compassion in keeping him alive.  Also, one of the "wives" likes him.

"WHY DO WOMEN STEAL MAX'S SCREEN TIME!!!" - Some Men's Rights Douchebag.

This goes back to the "self contained movie thing" but yeah, most recent movies need some sort of supplemental material for the audience to understand it.  This shouldn't be necessary for EVERY action movie.  The GI Joe movies, for example, are absolutely ridiculous when taken out of context.  For all the reasons reboots exist, GI Joe is the least understandable.  Snake Eyes better be able to deflect bullets with his sword because these movies take place in the REAL WORLD.  There is a reason soldiers don't sword fight anymore.  

5.  It's a Miracle This Movie Even Got Made

Let's all take a step back and appreciate that Mad Max:Fury Road is a goddamn miracle.  I'm serious.  What about this movie even makes it seem possible in modern day Hollywood?  The only thing that makes sense is "reboot of a sorta popular franchise", but even then, Mad Max has always been niche.  How did it get this good of a budget?

Let's consider the following:
  • The original creator and director, George Miller, was allowed to reboot/sequalize his own franchise despite the fact that he had been doing nothing but children's films for the last 2 decades (notably, the completely CGI Happy Feet).
  • Miller was allowed to do this movie with very little CGI, the only thing he has used recently, and instead use practical effects which always look better go AHEAD AND CALL ME A HIPSTER!
  • Miller was allowed to do this with, seemingly, very little studio interference although this is impossible to know for sure.  (Does he have naked pictures of somebody or something?).
  • Miller was allowed to make the title character a sidekick in his OWN MOVIE, with something like 8 lines of dialogue, and destroy his iconic car.
  • Also, Miller is over 70 years old.
  • Also, also, a Hollywood studio realized that a medium sized budget can turn a profit and make itself some money even if it's not a MEGA profit.  Take note, AAA video game studios.
How in the hell did this movie get made?  I...don't have an answer for this.  Leave a comment.  It's open to anonymous comments, which I may regret if more than 20 people ever read this.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

To wrap things up, I LOVED Mad Max:Fury Road.  Sound editing aside, (did anybody else think it was hard to hear dialogue during actions scenes or did my years of rock concerts deteriorate my hearing?) just about everything came as close to perfect as I could imagine.  Please, PLEASE make more movies like this Hollywood. 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

See my discussion with fellow Imperator AJ on Avengers:Age of Ultron here.

See my preview of my most anticipated movies of 2015 here.  Mad Max:Fury Road is one of them.

Follow me on Twitter.

Saturday, May 9, 2015

AJ and Jason Discuss: Avengers Age of Ultron

SPOILER ALERT:  I'm pretty sure anybody who would read a discussion of Avengers Age of Ultron has already seen the movie, but here is your spoiler warning just in case.



AJ

Okay, Jason. We've both seen Avengers 2 and we both have things we want to say about it. So let's start easy. Give me a score, 1-10 with 10 being the greatest movie ever created in the history of humanity, and give me 3 basic thoughts about the movie. 

Jason

Ranking a movie 1-10 is not easy my friend, so I'll go with a solid 7, the safest of all rankings.  I think Dr. Strangelove is the best movie ever made and a 10+, while Back to the Future is my favorite movie of all time, but probably an 8 because I'm weird like that.  7 is safe for Avengers: Age of Zingertron because I liked it, but I was also annoyed by a few things.  

I thought the direction was really, really good.  Joss Whedon can really frame a shot to look like a comic book panel, especially during action scenes.  The opening scene shot of the whole team attacking Hydra in the woods was great.  The final fight with the whole team in a circle fighting legions of robots was great as well.  Whedon also really shines during the quiet moments too like the scene where everyone was having drinks and taking turns trying to lift Thor's hammer.  However, I thought it was unfortunate that SO MUCH was packed into this movie that more of these great quiet moments had to be left out for non-stop action, although I realize how nitpicky that is and I should apply for a job with CinemaSins.

Two gripes I legitimately have are with the pacing and SickBurnBroTron, but I'll hold off on him for now.  The pacing is really odd.  Everything seems to happen way too fast, partly because of "I have more one-liners than Terminator Tron's" stupid plan, but also because of the 18 settings for the movie.  They're in New York! Now Africa!  Korea!  Eastern Europe!  It's hard to get a sense of where and when.  I'm confused on the timeframe.  Did these events occur over a few days, a week, several weeks?

What did you think of the movie overall and I'm curious if you have any thoughts on the pacing.  (I am aware I gave you two thoughts and went more in depth than "basic".  You can't tell me what to do!).

AJ

I liked the movie overall. I think a 7 is completely appropriate for it. It was a complicated film that had a lot of things to try to accomplish. They had to build off not only the first Avengers movie but keep in line as each of the main stars also had another movie of their own to develop their characters. It's a lot of balls to juggle at once and I think they did an admirable job of it overall.

My biggest gripe with the film was probably that they spent too little time on THIS film and too much time making call backs to previous films or setting characters up for what they're going to be doing in the future. The most glaring example of this was the Thor flashback, which we saw several times and was 100% about Ragnarok and not Age of Ultron. I understand the need to move characters along because they all have solo films to get to after this but the Avengers movies are about the Avengers being together. Devoting significant chunks of time to splitting them up only serves to defeat the purpose of the entire Avengers concept - they all have solo films, let them do their solo shit there.

A big to do has been made about the decisions regarding Hawkeye, his big reveal, and how it was handled. For me, I enjoyed it, appreciated it, and thought almost nothing of it beyond that. It was nice to see him get serious screen time and finally provide some layer of depth to a character making like his 5th appearance. The end.

The shit with Nick Fury, however, was pure nonsense. The guy randomly shows up at Hawkeye's hideout, NO EXPLANATION WHATSOEVER, and proceeds to drop random motivational bombs, including his whole "no fancy SHIELD toys this time, bros", only to randomly show up again later in the movie....with a fucking helicarrier. So...about that lack of SHIELD toys....

And yes, I absolutely have thoughts about the pacing. I completely agree with everything you said. You know they handled it poorly when nerds have been arguing on the internet for a week that they were in Wakanda for the vibranium or not. When people who are devoted to the movies aren't 100% where the movie is even taking place, you've made some mistakes along the way. It was very peculiar.

All of that said, there were things I definitely loved about the film. Scarlet Witch was excellent. Quicksilver, despite not being given much to do, was enjoyable to watch in action. The tiny moments always make big differences to nerds like me. I loved the small touches scattered throughout. Meeting Ultron for the first time and he was wearing the crimson cape was awesome, as it was a nod to the Crimson Cowl in the comics. I loved seeing Vision and Scarlet Witch interact, knowing they have a big future together. I loved more explanation of the stones and their importance and probably my favorite moment in the entire movie was during the credits when Thanos put on the Infinity Gauntlet. I remember being excited when they were making the first Thor movie and teased the Infinity Gauntlet. A million years and a complete Marvel explosion later, WE'RE FINALLY ABOUT TO SEE IT PAY OFF. YES.

Take that, two thoughts. 

Jason

Oh man, I forgot about the magical helicarrier.  That was some plot convenience if I've ever seen it.

Good points on much of the movie acting as a set up for future solo films.  I thought those scenes came across as padding in a movie that really didn't need it.  So much was already going on.  That said, I did like the decision to give characters who don't have solo movies, mainly Hawkeye and Black Widow, more screen time for character depth.  Hawkeye's scenes were handled well and I particularly like the line near the end of the movie where Hawkeye acknowledges how ridiculous it is that he is fighting robots with a bow and arrow. It was fun to see him have a sense of humor being on a team with overpowered weirdos. Family man Hawkeye was also less weird than I thought it would be and basically turns him into something like the "every man" of the group.  Someone to relate too....kinda.   

Black Widow's scenes, however, were more problematic.  Previous movies hint at Black Widow having a dark past in which she did things she is not so proud of.  Loki has a conversation with her in the first Avengers where she talks about having "red in her ledger" and Loki responds by questioning if she can truly make up for the terrible things she did in her past.  This is a classic redemption arc....which was thrown away in favor of being a sterile "monster"?  While much of the internet thought this was worthy of driving Whedon off of Twitter for, I hated it more for its continuity rather than some sexist statement (although it is a little sexist still since the whole wanting babies thing seems to come out of left field).  It's also small potatoes when the monster she is trying to relate too is a giant green rage ogre.  Not all monsters are equal.  

Side note:  Some people on the internet thought Whedon was being sexist with her being a damsel in distress but I thought it was okay.  Her kidnapping isn't the main focus of the movie, she's the reason the rest of the team finds out where Ultron is, and she basically saves herself so, whatever.  It's more a product of lazy writing than anything.  

I thought that most of the new characters were okay.  I agree with you on Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver,  even if Scarlet Witch's powers were vaguely explained.  Quicksilver is overpowered as hell so it was probably a good thing they killed him off.  Vision is okay but divorced from the comics, I bet many people think Vision IS Jarvis.  He also is a good way to help explain what the hell the infinity gems are while also keeping them purposely mysterious.  

But....there is one other new character who I thought was a huge disappointment.  Ultron was nothing what I expected and the biggest flaw in this movie for me.  Before I tackle this, do you have any thoughts on the villain?  I'm afraid of turning this reply into a 2,000 word essay.  

AJ

I guess it's hard for me say that Ultron was a disappointment. I never liked the Ultron comic book story line and was pretty comfortable with the fact that I wasn't going to enjoy this, either. His humorous little quips were classic Whedon and didn't really bother me much. Because this movie was going to be so self-contained, I wish they would have just gone straight ahead and made Hulk the villain. It would've skipped the waste of time Ultron story line, the GOD AWFUL Hulk-Black Widow romance, and would have set Hulk up PERFECTLY for the Planet Hulk movie...which is where he's going to end up anyway.

This movie was all about getting the main characters to Civil War, Ragnarok, and Infinity War in one piece. I understood why they had Ultron be the villain. It was a popular story line, it fit with Tony's maniacal obsession with protecting the Earth on his own, and it was easily contained to one movie. What happened instead was they ended up wasting a perfectly fine villain and turned him into more of a cartoon than he ever was in the comics. It's basically a repeat of what Iron Man 2 did to Whiplash.

One last point I wanted to touch on was you mentioning them keeping the infinity gems purposely mysterious. I hate this. We are not 3 Iron Man, 2 Cap, 2 Thor, 2 Avengers, and 1 Guardian of the Galaxy movies into the MCU, which has spent the ENTIRE TIME  building towards the Infinity War. When those movies start, I do not want to spend ANY time fucking explaining them. They've been dancing around them for TEN god damn movies by now and all we REALLY have is the scene with The Collector in Guardians explaining them. UNLESS EVERYONE WAS PAYING CLOSE ATTENTION, we're going to have to re-visit this shit in what will be WELL COVERED TERRITORY by the time Infinity War rolls around! I'M CLEARLY NOT PLEASED WITH THIS. Of all the AMAZING things they've done to setup this universe and these movies, this is BY FAR my longest-standing gripe with the plan as a whole.

Now I know you have lots to say about Ultron. So hit me, dawg. 

Jason

Now that I think about it, I agree with what you said about the Infinity Gems.  I'm sick of origin stories as it is and I have a suspicion that Infinity War Part 1 is going to be the origin story of magic rocks.

I've been of the opinion that the MCU has had difficulty establishing any interesting villains.  They never seem to be that much of a threat to the heroes, their motives range from generic evil to revenge against the hero, and most of them exist due to the heroes incompetence.   Iron Man mostly fights other Iron Men instead of Whiplash or The Mandarin who was turned into a joke.  Red Skull is a Nazi.  Hydra just wants power.  Loki?  I have NEVER understood why this guy is so popular.  He's a whiny baby who is angry that his dad loves his brother more.  And...Loki is the best villain to date, which says more than I ever could.

Ultron was intriging because AI is usually depicted as cold, humorless, amoral, and logical to a zero-sum fault in movies.  It also didn't help that the trailers made him look intimidating as hell, like, "YES.  This guy is gonna give the ludicrously overpowered Avengers a real fight."  Instead, he was a wise-cracking, strangely under powered, hypocritical robot who monologued about evolution while simultaneously wanting to build himself a body.  Shouldn't the coldly logical robot, who has a coldly logical motive to end all war by killing everybody (Oh my Cthulhu, he HAS REAPER LOGIC), realize he's better off just jumping from robot to robot?  How can he claim to be a superior evolved being when he wants to make himself more human, while also wanting to kill all humans?

Also, I'm not trying to say a zinger-flinging villain can't be good, but with Ultron it went too far.  When the Hulk jumps onto the jet and Ultron says, "Oh god, what now", I couldn't help but roll my eyes.  I half expected him to raise his hands, look directly into the camera and say, "Can this day GET any worse", followed by a laugh track.  I get that he took on some of Stark's personality since he created him but...I think I would have prefered the stereotype AI character.  Ultron seems closer to Bender from Futurama rather than Skynet from Terminator.  

Oh, and Ultron got trounced by the Avengers.  Just like the aliens in the first movie, I never felt like he COULD win.  Obviously, we all know the heroes in a PG-13 comic book movie are going to win, but I want them to have to work for it a little.  Ultron is just another villain who doesn't pose a threat.  Hell, he gets his ass kicked during his reveal when The Avengers didn't have their gear, were completely taken by surprise, and FUCKING DRUNK.  If Ultron can't put up a fight then, what the hell is he going to do for the rest of the movie?  The Avengers are too powerful.  Thanos sure is taking his sweet time.  

I feel like I could write a novel about Ultron but I'll stop here.  Speaking of things getting long, we should probably wrap this up.  Any lingering thoughts?  Counter-points to my Ultron hate?  Reasons why Civil War is a sub-title to a Captain America movie despite having half the Avengers in it? 

AJ

I gave you the floor for Ultron. I don't have any particularly strong disagreements about what you said. A lot of nodding and "yeah, you tell em" went on while reading all of it. I will say Civil War is my favorite comic book story line ever and they had better not fuck it up but that's a rant for another day.

My last thought on Avengers 2 is that walking out of the theater, I liked it. It wasn't a slam dunk like the first one in my eyes but it accomplished a lot of its goals and as the second movie of a series it turned out okay. It was a good, solid, flawed comic book movie. I'm ready to close the book on this sucker so we can gear up for Mad Max next week!!

Jason

Agreed.  Ultron aside, I actually did like this movie despite spending so much time complaining about it.  It was fun.  Not as good as the first but not as bad as a few others in the MCU.  

And yeah, I am SO stoked for Mad Max Fury Road.  Till next time!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Follow AJ on Twitter

Follow Jason on Twitter

Friday, May 1, 2015

Atari: Game Over Review

BEE DOO.....BE do BE do BEE DOOO

On a whim, I decided to watch the documentary Atari:Game Over last night.  It's a film covering the 2014 excavation of the Alamogordo landfill that Atari supposedly buried millions of cartridges of the ET Atari 2600 game.  The film questions why Atari (a company) threw away millions of copies of "the worst video game of all time" (an unwanted product) as if this is a mystery or something.  Unfortunately, while getting to the MOST OBVIOUS ANSWER EVER, most of the movie comes off as a love letter to Atari and since this movie is barely over an hour long, it's not like they didn't have time for more depth.

The history lesson about the rise and fall of Atari is pretty good for the first 2/3rds.  The movie does a good job of storytelling the humble origins of Atari with Pong and other coin-op arcade games.  It gets to the point about Atari being the fastest growing company in America after the release of the 2600 and making some blockbuster games like Yar's Revenge and even Raiders of the Lost Ark before ET decided all movie licensed games must suck.  And I mean, Edmonton Oilers suck here.  It lasts for years.

Sometimes decades.

It was important to bring up those games though as the guy who programmed them, Howard Warshaw, programmed ET.  At this point, the documentary goes almost out of it's way to say how much Steven Speilberg liked the game and how Warshaw only had 5 weeks to make it.  That's fine.  He's forgiven.  Warshaw even gets a bit emotional when he is invited to the excavation and is overwhelmed by the amount of people who showed up.  This includes the author of Ready Player One, Ernie Cline, who went to the excavation after picking up his Delorean from George RR Martin because this is a factual sentence I get to write.  I'm not kidding.  This happened.

But what's weird about this film, other than nerdy authors owning a nerdy car that he loaned to another far more famous nerdy author, is that Atari seems to take zero flak.  At times, it seems like Atari was just being a "bold, new, innovator that takes risks" rather than a "frat boy with too much money taking stupid risks" which seems more like the truth.  The fact that Atari killed the game market in 1983 due to over saturation is glossed over while simultaneously excusing ET.  I agree that ET didn't single-handedly kill the market, but come on movie, it was a part.  It's like they wanted to make a bumper sticker that read "Atari doesn't kill games, people not buying ET killed games."

The climax of the film is kind of a let down.  They DO find ET cartridges but it ends up being only about 10% of the total Atari games they find.  It's like, this totally mundane urban legend has a totally mundane explanation.  Yeah, Atari threw away a bunch of copies of ET but they also threw away all of their other unwanted product.  Then, the movie ends with a bunch of people talking about how awesome ET actually is and that's it's actually a good game and revisionist history shit.

"So, you see, this is why Atari didn't land on the moon."

Listen, I don't think ET is "The Worst Video Game of All Time".  For one, it actually works.  The game isn't a glitchy mess, something even modern day games have problems with.  It's also one of only a handful of Atari games you can actually finish, which was innovative for the time.  ET isn't even the worst Atari game, nor the worst Atari "thing" since the Atari Jaguar CD exists.

It's a toilet.

That said, it's by no means a good game.  I'm one of the lucky, or, unlucky few to have played this game when I was, like, 5 years old.  My parents had an Atari 2600 and about 10 or so games.  Obviously, my memory is fuzzy and possibly corrupted, but I remember Combat, Space Invaders (obvs), Asteroids, Missile Command for sure (my Dad's favorite), and ET.  I never beat it.  When the point of the game is to collect parts to your spaceship that randomly appear in holes, holes that are difficult to get out of due to shitty controls, enemies that are significantly faster than you and take away the parts you already collected.....AND your health decreases simply by fucking walking, you're not gonna have a good game.  No amount of sunshine and rainbow filled nostalgic thoughts are going to change that.

I have a soft spot for Atari.  It introduced me to games at a young age and it kick started a hobby I've never left...except for one time but eh that's a different blogpost.  But let's not pretend Atari is not without fault here.  It's fine to be nostalgic for the good ole days, but don't gloss over the bad too mmmkay?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Follow me on Twitter.  

I do wish my parents never sold that Atari 2600.